Ain't it grand?

As I drove down the Transit Street this weekend, I noticed a hot air balloon in the new Eckerd on the corner of Summit Street.

"Grand Opening!!!," it proclaimed.

As I recall, the store opened more than two months ago.

Isn't it a little late for a grand opening? Not to mention, who doesn't know that it's already open?

Now, I must point out that I didn't go in, so maybe I'm not the best judge on this, but I'm guessing the cheese is warm and the crackers are stale — since (oh, by the way did I mention) they opened two months ago.

I don't recall Eckerd having a "Grand Closing!!!" sale when it axed the downtown location and the one out in the town. Where were the balloons then?

You know what the worst is, though?

Stores that have grand opening after grand opening after grand opening.

How many times has Rosa's opened since it moved into the mall two years ago?

It opened in November, 2000, but it seems like every time I drive by, there's a banner hanging off that says "Grand Opening!!!" (Note that there's always exclamation points and balloons).

I know some chains of stores have grand openings every time another store opens within the chain. It's like celebrating the birth of a grandson or something.

It's like they think we're sitting around going, "Oh, there's a new Widgetmart opening in Boise, let's celebrate by stocking up on whatzits."

Or something like that.

Just in case you didn't smell the sarcasm, I'll let you know — it's there.

Then, of course, you've got stores claiming to be closing, moving or going out of business.

There's a golf store in Williamsville that has been closing for three years.

It actually closed once — only to reopen for its closing sale.

And don't forget good old Lerch & Daly.

Last I heard they were closing. Or was that moving?

Oh yeah, it was, "We've decided to move, downsize or even get bigger, we just don't know yet."

Thank you, Charlie Gray. Now, what does that mean?

Christine Pritchard of the state Attorney General's office told me at the time, "There is a law that requires a company to register ... for a going out of business sale."

I wonder if the same is true for a grand opening.

I hereby invite you to my "Welcome to the Union-Sun & Journal" party that I'm throwing myself since I've now been with the paper for nearly three years.

Or would you prefer to come to my engagement party? (I've been married more than six years.)

Both will be held at the newly constructed Wal-Mart out on the Transit Road. It should be having its grand opening any day now.

Keep your eye here for updates or watch for the balloons.

Bankrupt Dems checked by Hamister

Two fields were widened Monday.

The number of Democrats lining up to take pot shots and President Bush and the number of hockey teams taking pot shots at their fans.

Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., said he was a "different kind of Democrat" in his bid to unseat the man who assured Lieberman's title would remain senator — not vice president.

Lieberman, of course, was Al Gore's vice presidential candidate in the fun and exciting 2000 presidential election that was eventually decided by the Supreme Court (although it has been widely reported that the people of Florida had something to do with it).

Lieberman, in his announcement on Monday, reminded students at his old high school in Stamford, Conn., that he and Gore got a half-million more votes than Bush and Cheney.

Cheese with your w(h)ine? Would you like your sour grapes peeled?

Lieberman said he wouldn't run unless Al Gore didn't run. Gore, of course, dropped out in a blaze of comedy, practically calling the rest of the Democratic Party a bunch of whiny know-it-alls.

That left Lieberman open to possibly run, something I thought would make me happy.

Unfortunately, you can add Sen. Lieberman to the long line of Democrats who just don't impress me.

Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, and now Lieberman.

Yeah. Like I said. Unimpressed.

The sad thing is George W. "I am my daddy's son" Bush should be more beatable than this year's Sabres.

With no viable Democrats, though, I'll be forced to vote for a third-party candidate (never let anyone convince you that minor parties are worthless).

Harry Browne, here I come.

Speaking of the Sabres, by the way, "our team" sought bankruptcy protection on Monday, joining the Ottawa Senators as NHL teams that can't or won't pay their bills.

But the NHL and the Sabres are presenting the bankruptcy — which I've always viewed in a negative light — as a positive thing.

"It will enable the Sabres to secure financing that will allow them to continue to operate in the ordinary course, subject to league supervision, while the sale process is completed," NHL Commish Gary Bettman told the media Monday.

So let me get this straight: The Sabres declare bankruptcy and that allows them to "secure financing."

That in turn could allow Mark Hamister — the Sabres' suitor — to pass go and collect $33 million from the state.

Let's review.

The Sabres can't pay their bills, so they say they're broke and that gives them access to money.

Meanwhile, a Buffalo businessman says he'd like to buy the Sabres but only with $33 million worth of the good people of the state of New York. And if he doesn't get it, he's going to take his puck and go home.

I say, "Mark, get the puck out of Buffalo."

Here's my solution to the whole thing in two easy steps:

1) Hamister can run for president — not that I'd vote for him, but that would get him out of the Buffalo area and assure that he wouldn't become the Sabres' new owner (apparently politicians' bids aren't counted).

2) The National Democratic Party can declare ideological bankruptcy, giving them the cash flow to take down George W. "I got less votes" Bush in the 2004 election.